|
1 July 2013 - Over the past year, nine arms control experts have been gathering regularly in different capitals to discuss issues related to combating the proliferation of small arms and light weapons (SALW) and to support the UN Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) process. Ambassador Ochieng Adala is a member of this Africa-China-EU Expert Working Group (EWG) on Conventional Arms which was established by Saferworld to encourage Africa-China-EU dialogue on conventional arms. Here Ambassador Adala talks about the work and successes of the EWG and prospects for the control of conventional arms going forward.
Firstly, can you tell us what you think is the most important characteristic of the Expert Working Group?
An important characteristic of the Expert Working Group (EWG) is its diversity. It brings together nine experts from Africa, China, and Europe, who have wide and varied experience in disarmament, advocacy, and practical involvement on matters of peace and security in their continents.
As a key member of the EWG, what do you think have been the most important outcomes from the EWG meetings you have attended in Brussels, Kampala, and Beijing?
There have been important outcomes from all three of the group’s meetings. At the first meeting, in Brussels (13 November 2012), one of the objectives was to discuss EU–China commitments to assist Africa in combating illicit proliferation of SALW. The most important outcome was the decision to focus on South Sudan and Uganda, and to this end, the EWG identified the kind of external assistance required by both countries to address demining, weapons collection, stockpile management and record keeping, training, and awareness-raising. The group also agreed on the need to conduct a fact-finding visit to South Sudan to assess the situation on the ground regarding disarmament, demobilisation, and reintegration.
At the second meeting, in Kampala (9 April 2013), we reviewed the group’s activities since Brussels. An important outcome was the development of a work plan for activities between April and August 2013, including a regional conference to be held in Nairobi on 2/3 July 2013 to address illicit SALW and ammunition in Eastern Africa. A fact-finding mission/study tour to South Sudan was also confirmed.
The purpose of the recent Beijing meeting (15 May 2013) was to hold a dialogue with Chinese actors on the implications of China’s abstention from the ATT on 2 April 2013, as well as look at China’s future engagement with the ATT process and implementation. A significant outcome was assurance from China that although it abstained on procedural issues, it still remains committed to an ATT that will help save lives when implemented objectively, without discrimination, and respecting the principle of non-interference.
Can you give an example of the role the group has played in furthering dialogue? Can you identify important lessons from those conversations?
There are several examples, but the two that come to mind are the extended meetings with EU partners in Brussels after the EWG’s formal meetings, where the emphasis focused on technical details of the treaty text; and the Beijing meeting with representatives from the Government of China, Chinese think tanks, and a cross-section of stakeholders, including those from major arms exporting countries and arms importing countries. Practical issues were discussed, such as the timeframe and the internal approval procedure for the treaty signature and ratification by countries whose representatives were present. China’s abstention and its attitude towards future engagement were also clarified. Possible international cooperation and assistance was also a key topic. The overall impression was that such dialogue and exchange, with the participation of governmental and civil society representatives, should continue and it was felt that this would definitely contribute to the treaty’s future. We also recognised that this will be a long process.
The EWG participated in the 16 May 2013 seminar on the Next Steps of the UN Arms Trade Treaty, organised by Saferworld and the China Arms Control and Disarmament Association (CACDA). Around 70 participants attended the seminar and exchanged views on issues related to signature, ratification, and implementation of the ATT. China’s further engagement was also explored. What do you think are the ratification prospects of the ATT? How do you think the EWG could further support the UN ATT process and encourage China to remain engaged in this process?
The ATT is important to all UN Member States, and particularly so to African states, which have suffered disproportionately from the scourge of unregulated transfers of conventional arms. The EWG needs to impress upon the EU, which has shown tremendous understanding of the problem and willingness to assist, to continue offering assistance to the EWG in the treaty’s implementation phase. The EWG should embark on repackaging the ATT in such a manner that salient points are clearly brought out to assist, particularly the African states, with legislative processes. In my opinion, prospects for China ratifying ATT are about 45% at the moment, but these chances might improve after China signs the treaty. I think that the EWG should use the AU Common Position on the ATT as leverage in dialogue with China in order to keep them engaged, given China's relations with African countries.
What do you see as the key areas of work for the EWG going forward?
(Editor:军控协会) |
京公网安备 11010102004558号